Tag: canada

What is Community Engagement in Ottawa

February 24

What is Community Engagement in Ottawa?

We called it “citizen participation” in the late sixties in Norfolk, Virginia, where I worked for the City of Norfolk as a city planner. Urban renewal was in vogue and I had to liaise with community groups in the inner cities where urban renewal took place. The program replaced dilapidated homes with public housing.

To help to identify what the residents of the inner city wanted in their neighborhood – in their homes and open space surrounding them–we played interactive games. We had paper cutout benches, models for housing types and asked for their preferences. We tried to develop a plan from their input. That was called “citizen participation”. To get federal program funding, we had to show and describe how we worked collaboratively with the inner-city people (mostly African Americans) in Norfolk, Virginia.

I have often wondered if and how the City of Ottawa would invite the public to comment on upcoming developments in our neighborhood. My curiosity increased with my discovery that over 3000 apartments units in highrise buildings have been proposed in our neighborhood in the last few years. Construction has already started on some of them.

 Where will all these people come from to fill these new units? And who will pay for the infrastructure required by the increased demand for roads and utilities? Who is the target market for all these units: families, singles, retirees? What effects would all these proposals bring to our traffic? To our water and wastewater systems, and electrical grid? Would our taxes go up to pay for the new infrastructure required or do developers pay for the increased demand for these services?

So it pleasantly surprised me when I saw an ad in my local community newsletter in Ottawa. The City of Ottawa, it said, was accepting applications for “community engagement” to review neighborhoods’ development proposals. What better way to understand plans for our neighborhood than to take part with the city in reviewing these proposals So, I jumped on the opportunity and applied.

The response to my application came a few days later, advising me: I have to belong to the local community association; sign a “non-disclosure” agreement, and that I’ll need some training provided by the City. Instead of providing training, I expected the City to find out what skills I would bring to these reviews. I sat back, awaiting info on my training.

When cleaning up my old emails yesterday, I came across my exchange with the City on the application I submitted ten weeks ago. Wow! I followed up and copied my local City Councillor on my response. That did the trick: I received an email from the city the day after explaining that their “priorities have changed” and that is why I have not heard from them. But someone will follow up this Spring. Does that mean that they have one training program in the Spring? Or that they do not need volunteers anymore?

More importantly, does the City want “community engagement” or just check boxes to reflect “political correctness”? I suspect the latter: the email I received from the City to my application ends with three expressions; “Thank you” “Mercy” and “Migwetch”! The first two words are standard in a bilingual city with English and French. But the last word got my interest. It is in a native language meaning “thank you”. OK. We are politically correct, the City occupies Algonquin lands and I suspect the native language word is an acknowledgment of that.

But only five percent of the Ottawa population is of native origin. The same percentage of the population is Chinese, Arabic, and Asian. Will we see “thank you” notes in City of Ottawa letters in Chinese and Arabic and Hindi as well to acknowledge other major ethnic groups? Just a question.

However, my more serious concern is the commitment of the City to “public engagement” – it has now been three months since I applied in response to a request by the City for “public engagement”. It looks like it will be another three months before there is a “training” session. The sluggishness and response to my inquiry lead me to believe that the City is more interested in checking boxes than receiving input from citizens on development proposals. Just my opinion.

My Take on the “Freedom Truck Convoy”

February 1, 2022

Everybody was talking about the truck convoy arriving in Ottawa last weekend. Friends from New Jersey and Oregon called us asking to what extent the trucks blocked our street. We live in the inner suburbs and had no truck passing by our house. Now the downtown area was another scene, but we did not go there. We saw some of the long-haulers going by on the Queensway, our major highway into Ottawa. Most of what we saw was on TV.

The trigger for the convoy was truckers’ dissatisfaction with rules introduced recently by the federal government mandating cross-border truck drivers to have covid vaccination. Now 90% of the cross-border drivers are vaccinated. So one would have assumed that the unvaccinated drivers were the ones in the convoy, but vaccinated drivers also came showing their solidarity. The original purpose of the convoy morphed into a much larger movement to get rid of vaccine mandates, including masking. People were clamoring for “freedom” from the lockdowns. People were fed up with two years of not living the “normal” way.

To have thousands of people congregating downtown Ottawa surrounded by thousands of trucks is no small matter. But the Prime Minister refused to meet with them and called them “fringe”, not representing Canadians. And the PM then moved out of his official residence for safety reasons, implying escalation of tensions, potentially resulting in trouble. In addition, he tweeted he would quarantine because one of his children tested positive with Covid. Very convenient. Could not meet the protesters. There were no politicians of his party and government officials to at least offer to meet with the protesters and hear them out. Shameful. I believe the government represents all the people of Canada, “fringe” or not. And the huge demonstration such as we experienced in Ottawa last weekend called for a serious government response to try to defuse the bottled-up frustration that two years of covid wrought. It was a major mistake to write off the protesters and not have a plan to meet with them, no matter how wacky their demands may have been (the provincial government controls the lockdowns).

But the more significant mistake occurred when the government, which controls the international border, announced late last year that all cross-border truck drivers had to be vaccinated. Before they brought in the rule, the truckers had had an exemption from vaccination because of the economic importance of the truck traffic between and the US., and at any rate, 90% of the truck drivers have been vaccinated. So why not continue with the then-existing rule? If the government wanted to ensure the virus was not brought into Canada by the truckers, then it could have asked for a test at the border, in place of vaccination. Many companies followed the test or vaccination approach. What was the thinking of government policymakers to make it mandatory for the drivers to be vaccinated? It was an absurd policy.

I am fully vaccinated and I do not agree with the arguments anti-vaxxers use against the jab. But I respect people’s opinions and their right to demonstrate peacefully against the jab and to be heard. Science provides the best current knowledge on a virus such as Covid, which of course can change over time, with additional information. Today, the mRNA vaccine is the best vaccine against Covid, supported by statistical evidence (obtained by testing). I remember when DDT was the ”go-to” pesticide until it was not. Today the Pfizer vaccine is one of the “go-to” vaccines for Covid and I have it.

Most of the columnists have been critical of the “freedom convoy”. They called them selfish, their goals unrealistic and their behavior in downtown Ottawa, with their blaring horns, bothersome. I have no trouble with their protest so long as it is peaceful. I have trouble with the government’s policy on cross-border driving and their inept handling of the convoy in totally ignoring them, especially their unwillingness to meet with them. Just my opinion.